ABSTRACT
Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of drug-coated balloon (DCB) with paclitaxel in the treatment of femoropopliteal artery in-stent restenosis.Methods:From Dec 2016 to Jul 2020, clinical and follow-up data of femoropopliteal artery in-stent restenosis (ISR) treated with paclitaxel DCB were retrospectively analyzed.Results:Firty-two patients (56 lower limbs) with femoropopliteal artery ISR underwent DCB therapy. According to Rutherford classification, 1 case was R2 (1.7%), 9 cases were R3 (23.2%), 23 cases were R4 (41.1%), 15 cases were R5 (26.8%) and 4 cases were R6 (7.1%). According to Tosaka classification of ISR, 46 (81.2%)limbs were Tosaka Ⅱ, 10(17.9%)limbs were Tosaka Ⅲ Mean lesion length of ISR was (240±122)mm. Bail-out stent implantation was performed in 25% cases. The median follow-up time was 18 months. The all-cause mortality rate was 11.8%, the major amputation rate was 5.9%, the primary patency rate was 53.4%, the primary assisted patency rate was 67.1%, the secondary patency rate was 93.2%, and the F-TLR was 77.2%.Conclusion:DCB is a safe and effective endovascular therapy for femoropopliteal artery ISR.
ABSTRACT
Objective To assess the value of emergency interventional embolization in treating traumatic spleen rupture. Methods A total of 74 patients with traumatic spleen rupture, who were encountered at authors’ hospital during the period from July 2007 to July 2013, were enrolled in this study. The clinical data were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into embolization group (n = 38) and surgery group (n = 36). Interventional splenic artery embolization was carried out in the patients of the embolization group, and surgical repair was employed in the patients of the surgery group. The operation time, the amount of blood loss during the procedure, the hospitalization days, the preservation rate of the spleen and the occurrence of procedure- related adverse events were recorded, and the results were compared between the two groups. Results No significant difference in the operation time existed between the two groups (P = 0.061). The amount of blood loss during the procedure, the hospitalization days and the occurrence of procedure- related adverse events in the embolization group were significantly lower than those in the surgery group (P < 0.05), while the preservation rate of the spleen of the embolization group was significantly higher than that of the surgery group (P = 0.026). Conclusion Emergency interventional embolization is a safe procedure for the treatment of traumatic spleen rupture, this technique can improve the preservation rate of the spleen when compared with traditional surgical repair treatment.
ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the clinical diagnosis and treatment of acute renal infarction.Methods Two cases (3 sides) of acute renal infarction were reported.The patients were 1 male and 1 female,with the age of 62 and 54 years.Case 1 presented acute left flank pain,and enhanced CT showed a non-enhanced area in the upper and mid pole of the left kidney.The diagnosis of focal renal infarction was made and treated with low-molecular heparin (6000 U ).Case 2 presented acute both right abdominal and flank pain,and enhanced CT showed right renal artery embolism and right renal complete infarction.Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and catheter thrombolytic therapy was applied.4 months later,the patient presented acute left flank pain,and enhanced CT showed a low density area in left kidney without enhanced by contrast,and DSA and catheter thrombolytic therapy was applied again.Results In case 1,contrastenhanced MRI showed a still low signal area like enhanced CT after 2 days of treatment.The renal function remained normal in the follow-up of 36 months.In case 2,the right kidney resorted to moderate blood flow but became atrophy later.In the follow-up of 4 months,a recurrent focal infarction was confirmed in left kidney by enhanced CT.The left kidney also resorted to moderate bloodflow after DSA and catheter thrombolytic therapy.The renal function became normal after follow-up of 10 months and no new infarction was observed.Conclusions The diagnosis of acute renal infraction could be made by enhanced CT or MRI.Early diagnosis and location of the infraction renal artery is critical for recovery of the impaired renal function.Acute renal infraction should be suspected in patients with unexplained persistent and steady flank or abdominal pain in emergence department.